Published on February 17, 2026
On 16–17 February 2026, the NewsClick (PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd.) and its founder Prabir Purkayastha were penalised ₹184 crore under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
₹120 crore penalty on the company
₹64 crore penalty on the director personally
This is not just another enforcement headline. It is a serious compliance lesson for every company dealing with foreign investment or cross-border remittances.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) of approx. ₹9.59 crore (FY 2018-19) was reportedly received after misrepresentation of the company’s business activities — potentially bypassing sectoral conditions and entry route restrictions.
Foreign remittances amounting to approx. ₹82.63 crore (FY 2018-19 to FY 2023-24) were allegedly classified as export proceeds.
This reportedly involved:
Non-compliance with FEMA reporting requirements
Issues relating to mandatory filings such as SOFTEX forms
Declarations inconsistent with actual nature of transactions
Under Section 42 of FEMA, directors responsible for company affairs can be held personally liable for contraventions.
This is a critical reminder:
Corporate structure does not always shield individuals from regulatory exposure.
Whether you lead a startup, scale-up or an established entity, this development offers important compliance takeaways:
1. Compliance Is Not Optional — It’s Strategic
Regulatory frameworks like FEMA are designed to govern how foreign capital flows into and out of India. Entities must strictly adhere not only to the letter of the law but also to reporting requirements and declaration norms. Misclassification or inadequate documentation can lead to significant penalties, irrespective of intent.
2. Directors Can Be Personally Liable
Corporate compliance isn’t limited to organisational checks — statutory liability can extend to company directors and key managerial personnel. Understanding this personal accountability is critical, especially in financial reporting, corporate filings, and governance practices.
3. Documentation and Transparency Are Foundational
Even when foreign investments or remittances are legitimate, misreporting or failure to file mandatory forms (like SOFTEX for export proceeds) undermines compliance. Strong internal controls, audit trails and legal review processes are essential to safeguard against regulatory infractions.
4. Proactive Compliance Can Prevent Escalation
Non-compliance often creates a chain reaction — from adjudication orders to financial penalties and possible reputational impacts. Early engagement with legal and compliance experts, and adopting international best practices, minimizes risk and supports sustainable growth.
Regulatory frameworks such as FEMA provide the guardrails for cross-border financial activity in India. While foreign investment and international transactions are vital for business growth, they come with clear obligations.
This Rs.184 crore penalty reinforces a timeless lesson for professionals and business leaders: robust compliance isn’t a burden — it’s a strategic imperative that protects organisational integrity, financial health, and long-term reputation.